By Barb Hulet
This is who is deciding our elections. What an eye opener. As I traveled to Norwood yesterday the Democrats were out putting up Don Corum signs. I found that very interesting. Don't for one minute think that the machines in your county are secure if Dominion and the SOS came in and did a "trusted build upgrade". They created a crime scene, period. Always remember that they did this in 2019 after the governor race and in 2021 after the presidential race. It also affects down ballot races, too. We are in the middle of selection not election and have been for decades. Barb
About — Democracy Works
by David Clements
Have you heard of Democracy Works (EIN 77-0643932)?
https://www.democracy.works/about
An alternative name registered with the IRS for Democracy Works is COALITION FOR A WORLD PARLIAMENT AND GLOBAL DEMOCRACY (seriously).
When you go to the Coalition Site, it says their work has now been redirected under a new organization called World Parliament Now.
https://www.worldparliamentnow.org/
The World Parliament is financially supported by Citizens for Global Solutions.
The Citizens for Global Solutions want a new world federation, period, full stop. It is stated right here.
https://globalsolutions.org/federation/
So, Democracy Works has ties to a group that wants to create a new global government. Democracy Works runs the Voter Information Project which is made possible by Google technology which aggregates and distributes voting information.
https://www.votinginfoproject.org/faq
Using the Google Civic Engagement API.
https://developers.google.com/civic-information/
If you want to see which elections Google are monitoring, go here.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZNcwc9U6dYNzVOQmheECnnZDtH6zxdwbkT9Ns8iOX9k/edit#gid=1660772739
I can understand how voting on paper on one day in a precinct could be so threatening to this cabal of global organizations. They loose all leverage, Hallelujah!
"BONKERS!" Emerald Robinson on Utah's craziness
"Absolute Truth" host Emerald Robinson talks with Jen & Sophie about the crazy responses they have received from their public records requests. Stay up to date with Two Red Pills Channel on Telegram C
🔥More "absolute truth" and proof that Utah’s top officials and ES&S are colluding to stop us from getting election data‼️
https://rumble.com/v18sp67-emerald.html
An order to be complicit in fraud is unlawful.
Couy Griffin is about to be sentenced.
Prosecutors will try to punish him by asking for an excessive sentence for his courageous stand in Otero.
Couy said a prayer on public grounds, never went into the capitol, and has already served three weeks in prison, much of it was in solitary confinement.
From: KBB HAD A FAIR CHANCE, BUT NOW IT’S TIME FOR HER TO GO
- WHILE SITTING IN JUDGMENT OF OTHERS, KBB AND OTHER OFFICERS ISSUED AN ILLEGAL PRESS RELEASE CRITICAL OF A PRIMARY CANDIDATE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE.
March 16, 2022
By Maurice Emmer
CHARGE AGAINST KRISTI BURTON-BROWN
FOR VIOLATING ARTICLE III., SECTION C. OF THE CRC BY-LAWS
IN THE MATTER OF TINA PETERS’ CANDIDACY FOR SECRETARY OF STATE
Section III. C. of the by-laws of the Colorado Republican Party Central Committee (CRC) provides: “No candidate for any designation or nomination for partisan public office shall be endorsed, supported, or opposed by the CRC, acting as an entity, or by its state officers or committees, before the Primary Election, unless such candidate is unopposed in the Primary Election.”
There is no exception from the above provision.
Tina Peters is the duly elected clerk and recorder of Mesa County. Peters is seeking the GOP nomination for Secretary of State of Colorado; she has filed the necessary documents. On March 8, 2022, a grand jury returned an indictment accusing Peters of crimes relating to voting systems in Mesa County. Peters has not been tried, let alone convicted. If a trial occurs, it is months or longer away.
On March 10, 2022, the Chairman, Vice-Chair and Secretary of the Colorado Republican Committee (CRC) issued a press release urging Peters to withdraw her candidacy because of the indictment. (See end of article for the Press Release.)
Issuance of the press release was unequivocally violated Section III. C. of the CRC by-laws. It is understood that the CRC Chairman received many complaints and objections to the issuance of the press release. The Chairman has responded to some of these in writing. Instead of admitting obvious error, she attempts to defend her conduct. In sum, her defense is that a candidate under criminal indictment is not a viable candidate and that such a candidate can crowd out other unencumbered candidates. The Chairman further claims that the CRC’s responsibility to promote the election of GOP candidates is impeded by Peters’ candidacy.
While the GOP Chairman may feel strongly about her subjective determinations of the broader impact of Peters’ candidacy, the subjective opinions of the GOP chair do not supersede the by-laws. The Chairman is turning the GOP into the “ends justify means” party. She treats the by-laws like a Soviet train schedule: merely a suggestion. This is unethical and unattractive to voters.
It is impossible for the Chairman to justify issuance of the press release. The by-laws do not say, “unless the chair thinks she should ignore this rule, the officers must maintain impartiality in primaries.” The by-laws provide no wiggle room when it comes to impartiality. Why?
If there were exceptions from the impartiality rule, officers of the GOP could exercise partiality with impunity and then excuse their conduct by claiming an exception. Note that the by-laws don’t even contain an exception for open and notorious immoral conduct, an obvious impediment to electability. They do not say, “officers must remain impartial unless they have some dirt on a candidate that they feel must be revealed.” ANY EXCEPTION FROM IMPARTIALITY IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE THAT WILL BE EXPLOITED BY SOMEONE TO ATTACK CANDIDATES.
Further, if the Chairman is permitted to attack a candidate on the basis of some “special circumstance,” that will constitute the establishment of an unofficial exception from impartiality. An unofficial exception will be exploited as effectively as an official exception. If the GOP Chairman can disqualify a candidate because the candidate has been indicted, and only recently indicted at that, there will be an incentive for candidates to collaborate with prosecuting officials to indict potential electoral rivals hoping the party officials will pressure them to drop out.
In fact, an aspirant for the Democrat nomination for the Third Congressional District seat claims he just wrote to the United States Attorney urging a criminal investigation of the sitting GOP Congresswoman in that district. Is it coincidence that the CRC Chairman and her fellow conspirators issued the press release against Peters, then the next day this Democrat aspirant began to use the same tactic against his GOP opponent?
By setting this dangerous precedent the Chairman has opened the proverbial Pandora’s Box. Next, a candidate will not have to be indicted to be tossed out; an investigation will be enough. That’s what the Democrat mentioned above is hoping for. Does our Chairman lack the foresight to understand what she has done?
Some have rushed to the Chairman’s defense, claiming “party unity” is more important than following the rules. They argue that voters won’t vote for Republicans if the party rank and file insist that leadership follow the rules. The opposite is true. A party does not unify behind a leader who cheats. A lawless political party is unattractive to voters, and frankly doesn’t deserve the public trust.
The Chairman herself claims the superficial defense, “Wouldn’t it be justified to harpoon a candidate accused of a violent crime?” It might be tempting, but it wouldn’t be justified. What would be the standard? How serious must the crime be before the by-laws are violated and ignored? Besides, Peters is not accused of a violent crime. The Chairman arrogates to herself Imperial powers of judge and jury, as if she were Julius Caesar.
This incident reveals another troubling fact about the Chairman. In harpooning Peters’ candidacy, our Chairman lacked the intellect and guile to use proxies who are not bound by the impartiality rule. Not using proxies reveals a lack of reasoning ability or arrogance, or both. Neither is a qualification to retain her important position.
The conduct of the Chairman, and possibly the vice-chair and secretary, cannot be permitted to stand. They have done grave harm to the Colorado GOP and must be removed.
THE PRESS RELEASE:
https://www.cologop.org/news/colorado-gop-statement-on-the-felony-indictment-of-sos-candidate/
Colorado GOP Statement on the Felony Indictment of SOS Candidate
Basalt, Colorado – Colorado GOP Chairwoman Kristi Burton Brown, Vice Chairwoman Priscilla Rahn, and Secretary Marilyn Harris released the following statement today regarding the felony indictment of Mesa County Clerk & Recorder and current Secretary of State Candidate, Tina Peters:
“It is our belief, as leaders of the Colorado Republican Party, that any Republican candidate who is indicted with felonies by a grand jury and who will be charged by a Republican District Attorney should suspend their campaign while they undergo the legal challenges associated with those indictments. The Republican Party is the Party of law and order and we need every Republican voter focused on getting Republicans and constitutional conservatives elected across Colorado in 2022. Today, we are asking Clerk Peters to consider what is best for the Republican Party in Colorado and act accordingly as she avails herself of our judicial system.”
Colorado GOP Executive Director Joe Jackson added the following: “The Bylaws of the Colorado GOP are clear, the Party must stay neutral during primary races. Per those Bylaws, we will continue to afford Clerk Peters the same information and opportunities afforded other statewide candidates unless notified by her campaign that her status as a candidate for office has changed. We will not be making any additional statements regarding this situation.”
MyColoradoGOP.org note:
The following is an example for District Chairmen to follow regarding Colorado GOP Chairman Kristi Burton Brown’s edict removing all District Officers from their elected positions and nullifying all 107 District’s established bylaws. The State Senate District 24 Chairman is rightfully IGNORING the edict and running his meeting as a vacancy committee meeting.
Note: Many districts’ bylaws state that a voting member is automatically removed from their position if for any reason, including redistricting, they no longer live in the district. Officers, however, are elected in the Spring of an odd numbered year and SHALL SERVE a two-year term, or until they resign, are found incapable of serving, or are removed by a vote of a specified percentage of voting members.
January 17, 2022,
Dear (SD24 Vice Chairman),
You may have received a Call for SD 24, but you’re not in the new SD24 boundary! You probably already know that, but if not, I can save you a meeting to attend!
I confirmed the addresses of all PCPs in the new SD24 to that I can do a proper credentials accounting for the meeting, and surprisingly—or maybe not, most of them still reside within the new boundaries! You were the only exception.
FYI: I am treating this meeting as a vacancy meeting to fill your position as vice chairman, rather than as a “re-organizational meeting." Surprisingly, you are the only officer from the old SD24 that no longer resides in the new boundaries! I disagree with the state chairman about the appropriateness of having a “reorganizational” meeting when the district is not “new.” Below is the paragraph I sent out about my analysis:
I believe that our Republican state chairman, Kristi Burton-Brown, has interpreted the State bylaws (Article XVI, Section F 1, "Effects of Reapportionment”) incorrectly. You can see for yourself, the applicable section reads: “. . . each such new. . . senatorial. . .district shall be called to meet for the purpose of electing a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary, selecting a vacancy committee and adopting bylaws.” Her decision is solely based upon an interpretation of what constitutes a “new” district. She is interpreting “new district” to mean any district that has any changed boundaries, rather than, as a district that did not previously exist, such as the new congressional district Eight, a completely new district (we had Seven congressional districts before Reapportionment). A dictionary definition for “New” is, "not existing before,” or "recently born, built, or created.” Such definition makes more sense.
Additionally, there are no bylaws provisions, state or Adams county, for a “Reorganizational Meeting.” The term, “Reorganizational” does not appear in either bylaws. More importantly, neither does such term, or provision, appear in State Laws regarding party committees (CRS 1-3-103). However, the term “Organizational” does appear, and is specified to occur, for Senate Districts that are comprised of "a portion of one county," during the county odd-year Organizational meeting. I quote the law regarding Senate District central committee organizational meetings, "The committee shall meet on the same date and select a chairperson and vice-chairperson in the same manner as the party county central committee.”
If/when some government official fails to follow the law, or the Constitution, a higher law, should those officials below follow the higher official, or instead, follow the law/Constitution? I am attempting to follow the law, rather than our party chairman’s bad interpretation.
I just had a revelational thought that much of our Republican party may be running more like a communist party than as an American political party patterned after our Representative Constitutional Republic as it should be! Specifically, in a communist party, officials at each level have absolute power over everyone below them (sounds like a state chairman telling every senate and house district how they should respond to the boundary changes). But in a Constitutional Republic, the various divisions of power Federal, State, County, etc., have power and authority based upon the people who elected them, i.e. county officials don’t necessarily “work for” state officials, nor state for federal. In the case of Adams County (some of our bylaws, when changed under a previous chairman) imply that the various Central Committees (house and senate districts) are subservient the the County Central Committee (or its Executive Committee), but that is not the case, the state law does not imply or support such dictatorial structure! Bottom line, the neither the County Central Committee nor its Executive Committee, have the power to demand that HDs or SDs do anything, unless specified in statute (such as the requirement to have an Organizational meeting on the same day as the County Organizational meeting)!
Keith
Page 2 of 8
