PROJECT: ELECTION INTEGRITY - DON'T CERTIFY 2021 ELECTION
UPDATED FOR THE 2022 PRIMARY ELECTION
The articles below were posted and shared to encourage the Republican Canvass Board members for the 2021 Colorado elections to not certify the elections. Of the 64 counties, I am aware of only one that refused to certify.
CAN THE ELECTION BE CERTIFIED IF IT'S NOT VERIFIED?
DON'T CERTIFY 2021 AND DECERTIFY 2020
LETTER TO GOP CHAIRMEN - DON'T CERTIFY 2021 ELECTION
LETTER TO COLORADO CITIZENS - DON'T CERTIFY 2021 ELECTION
YOUR 2021 CANVASS BOARD MEMBERS – THE LAST, BEST HOPE FOR COLORADO
REP. RON HANKS LETTER ON ELECTION CERTIFICATION
TOOLS FOR COLORADO CANVASS BOARDS - IS 2021 CERTIFIABLE?
GENERAL ELECTION 2020 - NOT CERTIFIABLE
ADVICE FOR THOSE SERVING ON THE CANVASS BOARD
DESCRIPTION OF CERTIFYING AN ELECTION
(More links below)
Click on the image above to hear this very important interview.
ELECTION INTEGRITY ARTICLES -
2022 - EVER WONDER WHO IS DECIDING OUR ELECTIONS?
2022 - DEBATE - GOLD STANDARD OR PYRITE?
IRREGULARITIES IN THE 2020 ELECTION
2020 US Presidential Election Related Lawsuits
ELECTION INTEGRITY OR GASLIGHTING?
MEMES TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF CANVASS BOARDS
FOUR COLORADO COUNTIES REFUSE TO CERTIFY THE 2020 GENERAL ELECTION
BOULDER COUNTY REPUBLICANS DECLINE TO CERTIFY THE STATE 2020 PRIMARY ELECTION
DON'T TRUST COLORADO'S ELECTIONS 4-2018
BOULDER COUNTY CANVASS REPORTS 2010 to 2020
THE COLORADO ELECTION ESTABLISHMENT FACTION
THE 320 PEOPLE WITH THE FINAL SAY IN COLORADO'S ELECTIONS
UPDATE ON THE 320 PEOPLE WITH THE ELECTION'S FINAL SAY
COLORADO: THE ELECTION FRAUD TEST KITCHEN
CAN THERE BE AN HONEST ELECTION WITH ALL MAIL IN BALLOTS?
REFUSAL TO CERTIFY THE 2016 ELECTION IN BOULDER COUNTY
WHY BCR DIDN'T CERTIFY 2016 ELECTIONS
ELECTION INTEGRITY REPORT 2016
SOS SCOTT GESSLER ACCEPTING NON-CERTIFIED BOULDER ELECTION 2014
THE FIGHT FOR COLORADO REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE ELECTION INTEGRITY -
BASIC INFORMATION FOR THE 2021 REPUBLICAN SCC ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
LETTER TO THE COLORADO REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MAGA DRAG THE INTERSTATE PEACEFUL PROTEST FOR GOP ELECTION INTEGRITY
PHOTOS AND SPEECHES FROM PEACEFUL PROTEST FOR GOP ELECTION INTEGRITY
PROJECT: SAVE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY BY ENDING THE OPEN PRIMARIES
THE “OPT-OUT,” A BATTLE WE CAN AND MUST WIN
SAVE THE CO REPUBLICAN PARTY - VOTING MEMBERS OPT-OUT SURVEY
OPT-OUT OPINIONS, PRO AND CON
CRC, STEP UP OR STEP DOWN
COLORADO OPEN PRIMARY: UNCONSTITUTIONAL
CLICK HERE to hear the interview of Dr. John Eastman on the Kim Monson show on Thursday, September 9, 2021.
Colorado's Open Primary
Is An Unconstitutional Abridgment of First Amendment Freedoms
By Dr. John C. Eastman and Charles Heatherly
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's majority (7-2) opinion in the landmark CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al, V. JONES in 2000, which struck down California's Initiative 198, can help illuminate the current controversy over Colorado's open primary, a radical political reform adopted in November of 2016 by enactment of Proposition 108. The petitioners who took that California case to the U.S. Supreme Court included the California Republican Party and the California Libertarian Party.
CLAREMONT INSTITUTE STATEMENT ON SENIOR FELLOW JOHN EASTMAN
Dear Friends,
The Claremont Institute does not normally comment on the work of its scholars. But a recent combined disinformation, de-platforming, and ostracism campaign requires us to make an exception. Claremont Institute Senior Fellow John Eastman, acting as counsel to the President of the United States at a critical stage during the 2020 elections in December 2020 and January 2021, offered legal advice that has since been maliciously misrepresented and distorted by major media outlets. Following this disinformation campaign, some professional organizations have imposed a blackout on the Claremont Institute or on John, making it very difficult to present the truth.
The purpose of this statement is to correct the record and state the truth about two important elements of John’s legal advice having to do with the procedure of counting electoral votes in the presidential election.
1) Contrary to almost universally false news accounts, which have done great damage, John did not ask the Vice-President, who was presiding over the Joint Session of Congress where electoral votes were to be counted on January 6, to “overturn” the election or to decide the validity of electoral votes. John advised the Vice-President accede to requests from state legislators to pause the proceedings of the Joint Session of Congress for 7-10 days, to give time to the state legislatures to assess whether the acknowledged illegal conduct by their state election officials had affected the results of the election.
Read more: CLAREMONT INSTITUTE STATEMENT ON SENIOR FELLOW JOHN EASTMAN
BLUEPRINT 2.0
https://freestatecolorado.com/guest-post-karl-honegger-the-blueprint-2-0/
Guest Post: The Blueprint 2.0 by Sarah Harrison & Karl Honegger
Excerpts from the article:
This article is an in-depth look at the Financial Connections of the Colorado Political Class.
In 2008, the Blueprint was revealed to doers and donors outside of Colorado. The Blueprint was the plan of four key donors, Jared Polis (current Colorado Governor), Pat Stryker, Rutt Bridges, and Tim Gill, to turn this once vibrantly red state a dark shade of purple. It involved targeting key races and pouring in money that had rarely been seen there before, and this plan was given the ability to succeed because of redistricting and reapportionment in the 2000s.
Now we see a new group rising, with out-of-state interests at the helm, hoping to pull off a Blueprint 2.0. This group, unlike the original Blueprint, is shrouded in dark money, with very little transparency but a very clear agenda: change the landscape of Colorado elections forever.
Page 4 of 5
